But, it could be a minimal city (or downsize it to a town), large enough to support the oil industry. Then, keep everything else, support, larger communities, etc, 100-150 miles inland.
I don't think the "tourist attraction" should be rebuilt where it was. M!ke -----Original Message----- From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:28 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: House Speaker says New Orleans should be bulldozed under. The city of New Orleans is Necessary right where it is. That's why it exists. A City is required to support the highly important Oil and transshipment facilities that exist on the gulf coast. That city is New Orleans. On 9/5/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.antiwrap.com/?700 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:172652 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
