Uh. i agree with all that you are saying, but i don't know WHY you are saying it.
Jerry said he thought getting a BJ while on the phone with a head of state was just part of being president, and somehow less unsettling than Reagan's naps or Bush's misunderstanding of common worker tools. I thought that was a little strange, and questioned it. Not sure why you brought up all these obvious points that we've all pretty much agreed on (minus Sam :) > You mean that authorizing your assistants to deliberately break US law > isn't egregious? I'm referring here to Iran-Contra and Ronnie Raygun. > Also there was evidence that George Bush Sr. also knew and approved > funding and authorizing flights to Iran and exchanging anti-air > missles for fire arms to be delivered to the contras. > > so what's worse, getting a bj (admitted illegal in some states) at his > desk vs breaking US law, authorizing you minions to cut deals with > enemies sworn to destroy the country, laundering money, flying cocaine > into the US to help fund the contras, authorizing payments to known > torturers and mass murders, etc. > > Again you can say that no one died when Clinton lied. How many > thousands died as a result of the Iran-Contra scandal, or how many > have died in Iraq to date. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175176 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
