My issue isn't so much that she has experience outside the judiciary, but that she doesn't have any *in.* She also seems to be anti-abortion. That may not be a hot-button with the rest of you, but it is with me. Furthermore, by appointing her to Sandra Day O'connor's slot, he seems to be equating the experience of the two, which is rather insulting. Also, she is likely to be rejected as unqualified, wanna bet that Bush appoints a man after that? Like this is the most qualified woman out there.
Dana On 10/3/05, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yep, cronyism was the first thought that came to my mind. He should > > at least have selected a judge (preferably a federal judge). > > I seem to remember he stated a short while ago that he would be appointing > a non-traditional candidate. I, for one, like that she has experience > outside of the judiciary. > > > > > --- On Monday, October 03, 2005 8:28 AM, Gruss Gott scribed: --- > > > > > > Don't forget she was also a city councilwomen! This is baaaad pick. > > > > > Holy Brownie ... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175662 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
