"I was told that basically that I had to cover my shirt, or I was told
if I cover the shirt I can basically stay on the plane."

same article

On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> What I'd wonder about is the fact that they allowed her to board the
> plane and take-off.  As long as her behaviour didn't change they may
> have violated an implicit contract.
>
> That is, the company first deemed her appearance as complying with SW
> standards, but then changed their mind later.  That's fine for them to
> do, but then I'd think they'd owe her for time lost.
>
> Unless she changed into the shirt after the flight had taken off ...
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Get help! RoboHelp
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=58

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176205
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to