the BBC is biased against America?? On 10/7/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Take the whole thing with a grain of salt. Neither side is known to tell > the > truth. Neither side is to be trusted. Even the reporting side (which is a > BBC documentary) is known to be biased against Bush/America so it should > be > questioned as well. When I read something like this I look at who's doing > the reporting (AFP reporting on a BBC documentary), who's being quoted (a > Palestinian official), what their history is (lies, false reports and > broken > promises) and who they're talking about (Bush - need we say more). All > this > makes it look like a puff peace done with a specific goal in mind rather > than a true reporting of the facts. > At least that's my take and I just ignore the whole thing and laugh at > people who will use it to criticize Bush. If I was meaner, I'd try to sell > those same people a bridge. > > (Bush has done so many things publicly worthy of criticism that something > like this is just a joke) > > > Problem is that logic goes both ways. > > > > Has Bush been known to lie? > > Has his administration been known to lie? > > > > > > Crap now what? Who do you believe? > > > > Again, not saying Bush made these statements, there is no way of ever > > really knowing. > > > > I'd say I expect better from the President of the USA and his staff but > > truth is, I don't. They've descended into the realm of deniability and > > obstruction rather than the truth. > > > > Remember "I did not have sexual relations with that girl". Then later on > > the quote was something like "well according to my staff and legal > > counsel a blow job does not constitute sexual relations, so I thought I > > was telling the truth". > > > > How about the Iran Contra Affair? Watergate? Its not party specific, > > they all lie and try to obstruct the truth from being told. No wonder > > we're skeptical. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Look at the source here. Has the source been known to lie? Has the > > government of the source been known to lie? If the answer to both of > > these questions is yes, then this is just the BBC blowing things out of > > proportion again to try and embarrass Bush. > > I'd say I expect better from them but truth is, I don't. They've > > descended into the realm of tabloid rather than news source. > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This message including any > > attachments is for the sole use of the intended > > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > > intended recipient, please contact the sender and > > delete any copies of this message. > > > > > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176450 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
