do you see the distinction between "has not committed a very narrowly defined crime by virtue of good legal advice" and "has upheld the Constitution"?
On 10/25/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's the point, they haven't committed any crimes, it's a witch hunt > to get rid of them with trumped up charges because they can't beat > them any other way. > > > On 10/24/05, Ken Ketsdever wrote: > > > > What exactly makes this quotable? It is one ass's opinion. If Bush, > > DeLay, Rush or anyone else regardless of party affiliation has committed > > a crime then they should be prosecuted, rank, affiliation, etc... should > > not make one above the law. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:178007 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
