> Dana wrote: > limiting individual access to members of congress doesn.t limit free speech? >
No, not under if the rules are sound. I'm not going to go into it, but basically you'd limit the access to constituents which would logged and overseen by a non-partisan watchdog group. For example with the Abrams corruption you've had a Chicago(?) house member pushing for an Arizona(?) Indian casino? Uh ... why? What does that have to do with is district? Put another way, if you wanted access to your Senator, make an appointment. If I want access I can request it there's going to be a threshold of need I have to cross and then that meeting is going to be reviewed. Obviously there'd be exceptions and you'd need to prevent abuse, but it could be done. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180036 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
