Sam Clinton and Kerry may also have thought that Iraq had WMDs but they did not intimidate into silence the CIA analysts who thought otherwise, and they did not bring the considerable resources of the federal government to bear on those who dared to say they were wrong. That is the difference.
Dana On 11/9/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then who lied? > Clinton? Kerry? Rockefeller? Kennedy? > They all claimed Iraq had them. > > > On 11/9/05, Ken Ketsdever wrote: > > Where are the WMDs? Where are the purchase orders for yellow cake. It > > seems that if someone wants to go after the administration you need > > written physical proof anything less is lies, innuendos, or vengeful > > attacks. Hey well lets use the same level or proof for justification > > for war. Where the hell are the WMDs, seems to me a few months ago the > > administration even hinted to the fact that they may not exist. > > > > If you are part of the administration as long as there is a hint of > > deniability you are safe. If you are against the administration then a > > hint of possibility is enough to convict. WTF? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Stay Ahead of Hackers - Download ZoneAlarm Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=65 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180910 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
