I think Dionne says that: Neither side wants to talk about the context in which Bush won a blank check from Congress to invade Iraq. He doesn't want us to remember that he injected the war debate into the 2002 midterm election campaign for partisan purposes, and he doesn't want to acknowledge that he used the post-Sept. 11 mood to do all he could to intimidate Democrats from* raising questions more of them should have raised*. emphasis mine. I'll get to your no doubt apologist link later ;)
Dana On 11/15/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You're too funny. We didn't do our job because there was an election > :) Bush's fault. > > By the way, according to the Washington Post: > The lawmakers are partly to blame for their ignorance. Congress was > entitled to view the 92-page National Intelligence Estimate about Iraq > before the October 2002 vote. But, as The Washington Post reported > last year, no more than six senators and a handful of House members > read beyond the five-page executive summary. > > December 2005 > Who Is Lying About Iraq? > Norman Podhoretz > > http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Production/files/podhoretz1205advance.html > > > On 11/14/05, Dana wrote: > > But at least it's sight > > Dana > > Another Set of Scare Tactics > > > > By E. J. Dionne Jr. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182098 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
