actually I think I am against both incentives.... not that I have given the matter a lot of thought.
Dana On 11/27/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What this states but doesn't make clear is that the heavy equipment > credit is designed for companies that need to update old equipment. Many > companies are using outdated equipment that did much more damage to > environment that newer ones. > > Accountants took advantage of the law and assisted people in creating > corporations that did nothing so that they could purchase the vehicle. > > Keep in mind that you could theoretically use both laws, if you > purchased a hybrid over 3 tons you could write off that purchase and get > the clean air tax credit. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 5:23 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Higher Taxes for Hybrids > > > > and this > > > > > http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/cars_pickups_suvs/tax-incentives-su > v- > > loophole-vs-clean-vehicle-credits.html > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184174 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
