No, I don't think so. At least not at a significant enough sales level to really blame the incentives. I don't have figures, but my guess is that people who were going to buy something as big as a Hummer were going to buy it anyway and the incentives just finally gave them their reason to trade in their monster truck with the 70 inch tires from the 1980s for something new and just as ridiculous.
c'est la vie On 11/28/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > granted, but it is also at least partially responsible for the shift > to heavier less fuel-efficient vehicles don't you think? In other > words we didn't just get ranch trucks getting replaced by newer ranch > trucks, we got Hummers as well. > > Dana ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184455 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
