Ah...  Yeah I think it will run on Win, but I have idea how well.  I
actually have it running on the same Linux machine as CF and even
sharing resources between the two it speeds things up quite a bit.

-Cameron

On 11/28/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that it's a unix based product might be a good reason why I'm not
> using it. I don't have a unix box or even a spare box to load linux up on
> (if it ran on linux).
>
> > You may not need Squid, but I think that you'd be suprised at the
> > speed improvement even on totally static .html files, not to mention
> > ..cfm files that require processing time from CF.  You can avoid
> > spending CF threads and memory and free up more resources for "real"
> > CF requests.  Often, depending on how often the file is requested,
> > Squid will serve it straight from RAM, skipping the hard drive read
> > all together.
> >
> > Many high traffic sites like CNN.com use Squid (or similar) cache
> > accellerators for static image files.  You can scale out with as many
> > Squids as you need while only keeping one CF (or other) source machine
> > in the background - making it a very cool scalability enhancer.
> >
> > -Cameron
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184499
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to