judging by the rest of my inbox, he is, ayup. Funny, this email didn't even
show up over here, so I sent another :) So then you are REALLY going to
think I am uptight.

But never fear, I am done with the topic. I am off to get me a smoothie then
back to work. I think I'll get TWO ginko supplements in it, what the fuck,
maybe that will get me accused of, of, believing the world is flat or
something :)

LOL. Here's to you, Larry.

Dana


On 12/4/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you two take a few deep breaths and stop acting like pissed off
> 3 year olds. There is debate and there is letting it get a little too
> out of control. You're both good people so just relax guys. I think
> anyone that is reading their email right now is cringing and going
> jesus christ they both need to get laid and loosen up.
>
> Except for someone like weegs hes probably setting at home with some
> popcorn cheering the fighting on :).
>
> I just dont like seeing you guys going for the throat. :)
>
>
>
> On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I get ginko balboa in my smoothie -- more or less for the hell of it --
> and
> > all of a sudden I have killed granny? Get a fucking grip.
> >
> > bullshit? folklore? witchdoctor? beads and rattles? FYI I was dianosed
> and
> > treated at one of the better university hospitals ;) And am now all
> better
> > :) Go get a life, Larry.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> > On 12/4/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Personal attacks don't get you anywhere. I had thought better of you.
> > > But given past behavior I'm not at all surprised.
> > >
> > > I am only a conservative in one area, when it comes to bullshit
> > > beliefs that I see in most new age and alternative medicine
> > > approaches. I don't follow folklore because its been proven wrong so
> > > many times when it comes to medicine and related fields. You may think
> > > its nice and great to have something like a witchdoctor wave beads and
> > > rattles over you while muttering nonsense disguised as a secret
> > > language as a cure. I look at the human cost of it. I have had to deal
> > > with the family survivors of people who were absolutely convinced of
> > > the effectiveness of laetril or Orgone rays, etc. Ginko falls into the
> > > same area. Its a POS approach that's is pure magical thinking - there
> > > is little or no attachment to reality. What do you tell the family
> > > that granny deteriorated faster than expected - buy hey I know its too
> > > bad, but its OK she was on Ginko Balboa. The shaman said it was
> > > supposed to work. Since it didn't it must be her fault. I've heard
> > > similar crap excuses from the alt med people. On the whole there is a
> > > substantial lack of ethics among them. More are concerned with
> > > separating money from their clients than actually trying to help them.
> > >
> > > Do your great studies report on dropout rates - How do we really know
> > > what the actual effect of the drug is when most of the subjects
> > > dropped out for one reason or another? So there was an effect on the
> > > remaining members of the treatment group - was it due to the ginko, or
> > > some other characteristic common to the study survivors. You cannot
> > > tell one way or another. Are you willing to bet someones life, or as
> > > importantly someone whole essence on those results? If so that's more
> > > cruel to the person and their family than almost anything I can think
> > > of - the  promise of a false cure.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > > On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You have apparently never disagreed with him. Or read any of the
> threads
> > > > where he is talking to Sam. It isn't really worth my time to argue
> with
> > > him,
> > > > but he reminds me of the worst of Canadian bureaucracy... unthinking
> > > > conventional wisdom, and if you disagree you're a Luddite. That's
> > > annoying.
> > > > What really pisses me off though is that when you go look at his
> links
> > > half
> > > > the time they don't say what he says they do.
> > > >
> > > > anyway. A Cisco online test awaits. Take a puff for me, eh? I'd
> enjoy
> > > one
> > > > about now.
> > > >
> > > > Dana
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/4/05, Rastafari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > wow.
> > > > >
> > > > > one thing, larry is far from pompous... he is a gentle soul
> > > > > from what i could tell.  we are all VERY over smart people
> > > > > thats why we do what we do and how we do it...
> > > > >
> > > > > some of us just do not know to iterate everything we have to
> > > > > say, in the best method.  like a pizza delivery going to the
> > > > > wrong house.  Great pizza, bad delivery.
> > > > >
> > > > > tw
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I don't *think* I am demented :) But a) no it is not the issue
> and
> > > b) I
> > > > > can
> > > > > > see that the thread would be confusing. So here is a brief
> synopis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Jill asks what people are having for supper
> > > > > > 2. My answer - various health drinks; ginko balboa is mentioned
> > > > > > 3. Sam says I heard that didn't work
> > > > > > 4. In the throes of much caffeine I get sarcastic and say work
> for
> > > WHAT
> > > > > is
> > > > > > the question.
> > > > > > 5. Sam mentions memory, a previous lengthy thread here
> > > > > > 6. I tell him that's not why I had them add it to my smoothie
> and
> > > > > mention
> > > > > > the anticoagulant properties
> > > > > > 7. relatively amiable discussion, I summarize by saying right,
> some
> > > > > people
> > > > > > think it helps with dementia, there isn't much in the way of
> studies
> > > on
> > > > > > memory outside of that, but this si irrelevant, yada yada yada.
> I
> > > posted
> > > > > all
> > > > > > these studies in a discussion with Jim Davis months ago.
> > > > > > 8. Larry having apparentlly read none of the above jumps in to
> say
> > > that
> > > > > > science has proven that ginko balboa has no effect at all and
> once
> > > again
> > > > > > posts a link that does not seem to support what he is saying.
> > > > > > 9. I post link to study showing that ginko balboa potentiates
> > > coumadin,
> > > > > > wondering wtf, does Larry really think I would not have
> researched
> > > an
> > > > > > illness I had -- maybe I should tell him there's no evidence his
> > > insulin
> > > > > > pump works and he is a poor deluded soul clinging to hope when
> all
> > > is
> > > > > > hopeless :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 10. In a nutshell - It's a stupid argument. Larry is a pompous
> > > asshole
> > > > > who
> > > > > > should not give a shit WHAT supplement I have them add to my
> > > smoothie.
> > > > > But
> > > > > > he has it in his head that he is Mr Science and so obviously
> right
> > > that
> > > > > any
> > > > > > study out there must naturally support his suprficial
> suppositions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > back to work
> > > > > > Dana
> > > > > > On 12/4/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i get that... but dementia... was that the issue?
> > > > > > > or some blood/circulation disorder.  im demented too, its
> > > > > > > ok if you are :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > coumadin is an anti-coagulant. So is ginko balboa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dana
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12/4/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i guess i have no idea what this is all about.
> > > > > > > > > and what is coumadin for?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > tw
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > ok I went and looked anyway. It does say that there is a
> > > benefit
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > doses are pooled. Not quite sure what that means, but it
> > > does
> > > > > tend
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > indicate that the issue is a little more complex than
> you
> > > > > portray it
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > be.
> > > > > > > > > > Again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dana
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 12/4/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > tsk as usually you are poo pooing without reading.
> You'd
> > > be
> > > > > funny
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > weren't so condescending. The attitude of real science
> > > indeed.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello, I am talking about anticoagulation, as Sam has
> > > already
> > > > > > > > > realized.
> > > > > > > > > > > Remember that the next time you call him a
> Neanderthal.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > As for your study, don't have time. It may say this
> but
> > > given
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > track
> > > > > > > > > > > record I am willing to bet it says more than that too.
> In
> > > any
> > > > > > > event
> > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > are other studies, peer-reviewed, my friend. See the
> > > archives;
> > > > > > > posted
> > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > this summer. Ther aren't a lot -- there are problems
> with
> > > > > > > establishing
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > standard does as I have already mentioned.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dana
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 12/4/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I think that this Cocheran based meta analysis
> > > summarizes
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > attitude
> > > > > > > > > > > > of real science, there is no real effect for ginko
> > > beyond a
> > > > > > > placebo.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.antiwrap.com/?789
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ginkgo biloba Compared with Cholinesterase
> Inhibitors in
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > Treatment
> > > > > > > > > > > > of Dementia: A Review Based on Meta-Analyses by the
> > > Cochrane
> > > > > > > > > > > > Collaboration
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Kurza, B. Van Baelenb
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > aDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,
> Technical
> > > > > > > University
> > > > > > > > > > > > Munich, Munich, Germany;
> > > > > > > > > > > > bMedisearch International, Mechelen, Belgium
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
> > > 2004;18:217-226
> > > > > (DOI:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 10.1159/000079388)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Abstract
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Data were derived from the Cochrane Collaboration
> > > > > meta-analyses
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > efficacies of ginkgo, donepezil, rivastigmine and
> > > > > galantamine on
> > > > > > > > > > > > changes in cognitive function in patients with
> dementia
> > > and,
> > > > > > > where
> > > > > > > > > > > > necessary, were transformed to standardized mean
> > > > > differences.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > proportion of patients discontinuing trials was used
> as
> > > a
> > > > > proxy
> > > > > > > > > > > > measure of tolerability. Outcomes were assessed
> after 6
> > > > > months
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > treatment. Trial data for cholinesterase inhibitors
> were
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > > consistent than those for ginkgo, particularly
> regarding
> > > > > patient
> > > > > > > > > > > > populations and outcome measures. Significant
> benefits
> > > on
> > > > > > > cognition
> > > > > > > > > > > > vs. placebo were seen with donepezil, 5 and 10 mg,
> > > > > rivastigmine,
> > > > > > > > > 6-12
> > > > > > > > > > > > mg, and galantamine, 16 and 24 mg. Significant
> benefit
> > > vs.
> > > > > > > placebo
> > > > > > > > > > > > with ginkgo was seen only when all doses were
> pooled.
> > > > > Similar
> > > > > > > > > > > > proportions of patients discontinued treatment with
> > > ginkgo
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > placebo. Cholinesterase inhibitors were also well
> > > tolerated,
> > > > > > > > > although
> > > > > > > > > > > > a significantly greater proportion of patients
> receiving
> > > > > active
> > > > > > > > > > > > treatment discontinued vs. placebo with some doses.
> An
> > > > > > > > > evidence-based
> > > > > > > > > > > > medicine approach, taking into account the quality
> of
> > > > > clinical
> > > > > > > > > trials,
> > > > > > > > > > > > is essential when assessing the safety and efficacy
> of
> > > > > > > medications.
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:185724
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to