They've been mad for a long while that the term Spam (their trademark) is associated with unwanted and annoying email.
There just hasn't been any individual or corporation that they could pinpoint as violating their trademark. Google's got some deep pockets, and a fixed address. On 12/15/05, Jason Lemahieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would they sue for free advertising? I think I'm adding SPAM to my > shopping list so I can make these delicious sounding SPAM breakfast burritos > (serve with salsa) > > http://www.recipesource.com/main-dishes/meat/pork/spam/00/rec0017.html > > >No, that is painfully funny. > > > >Can you say trademark lawsuit? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188295 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
