> Nick wrote: > You know, I would have liked to have seen Rebecca hired just to piss off > Alla (The loudmouth) >
Yeah, I would've like to have seen anything that pissed off Alla. As to Rebecca, I disagree with most of you. My philosophy is that you hire someone for what they can do, not what they did. Randal might have had lots of checkmarks, but here's where he's going to fail for The Donald: 1.) No loyalty. He's working for himself period, and that may or may not merge with The Donald's interests. The minute he sees a shiny piece of bling elsewhere, he's gone. 2.) He's arrogant. In many of the tasks, he didn't do much. The Donald's older guy was about to hit him on that last night, but got cut off. He thinks he's more talented than he is, often acting as if his mere presence is enough for success. 3.) He's somewhat inert. He has many decent ideas, no great ones. His execution is poor. Look at his final task: 4 people to buy decorations, doesn't check the weather or have a plan B, and isn't holding people to timeline. That's just poor project management. Rebecca is the opposite of all of those qualities: loyal (almost to a fault), humble and works as a collaborative leader, is excellent at execution. Rebecca gets the details right the first time without direction. That's why she should've won. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188566 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
