> Nick wrote: > But so much of art is subjective. There are some things you can look at and > point out where the artists is clearly skilled, however you can't enjoy it > because well, you don't like it. >
Yes, but I'd like to think the line to draw is between art and entertainment (and nothing). There is a lot of art that I can't appreciate, but I still recognize it as art which includes art I don't like. For example, Jackson Pollock. I don't appreciate it, but I'm sure once you're able to see the fractals you could like it. Then there's that screaming schizo guy. I'd never want to hang that on my wall, but it's definitely art. So my contention would be that art likely isn't subjective, only our opinions of it are. Maybe that's saying it is ... I dunno ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188916 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
