"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Simple, the part where it says "unreasonable searches and seizures" as opposed to "non-Warranted searches and seizures" It ONLY claims that people shall be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, not once does it claim a warrant is needed. When pulled over for a speeding ticket, an officer observes a marijuana plant in the back of your car, does he need a warrant? No. When your ex wife has been brutally stabbed to death, and an office coming to your home finds blood on your white bronco, does he need a warrant to jump the fence? No. > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:39 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > No offense Nick, but which part of this tells you that a Warrant isn't > required > > "and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, > > supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the > > place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189185 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
