Abramoff paid just as many Democrats as he did Republicans and I'm giving the Dems the benefit of the doubt also. In my system you're innocent until proven guilty. When a slime ball gets caught and starts naming everyone to make it easier on himself, we need to find corroborating evidence to back up his claims. I'm sure many are guilty but some might have been duped.
I guess with you it's not the facts that matter but the seriousness of the charge On 1/6/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > It looks like the smoking gun is Abramoff - he has agreed to testify > about legislators and the deals he made with them. > > If that's not a smoking gun, then what do you want, the pols standing > over the body with a smoking gun with them ripping out the victim's > throat while raping his wife? > > How about the same standards you apply to the Clinton case. > > Whoops sorry I forgot slime and innuendo only applies when the accused > is a Democrat. > > On 1/4/06, Sam wrote: > > Yes but we're still along way off from a smoking gun. Abramoff is a > > trapped weasel trying to plea his way to a lesser sentence. I'll need > > more info before willing to convict anyone. I'm sure there are corrupt > > officials going down and I'm happy. But it's too long a list to start > > speculating. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:190854 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
