> Why do they care about their collective governing if they don't care > about them as a people? Hypocrisy and doublespeak rearing its head > again?
Don't really know, to be honest. I personally don't care about Cuba, Cubans, or their government. > > Whatever wealth they have is already in his hands. And that's good? > Again I ask you, what is Cuba's GDP? > What is the status of its medical facilities? > Where does it sit when compared to other countries in the region? > You haven't answered any of these questions yet. Because I don't know the answer to these questions. Why don't you just go ahead and spew them out....? > > An economic system that rewards Greed is one without conscience. > Appealing and fulfilling Greed above all, and a Conscience are > mutually exclusive. You don't need to have a high IQ to figure that > out. > Capitalism is an ECONOMIC system, capeche? It is NOT a moral system. Capitalism by itself would NEVER give to charity. But millions of capitalist Americans give billions of dollars to charity every year anyway. It's because they also adhere to other "isms" that do indeed deal with other considerations outside of pure economics. > > And something else can work better for citizens of other countries, > and perhaps for the greater mankind as well. Some people may look at > American Society and not hold it and it's ACTIONS in as high regard as > you do, whilst thinking it's IDEALS may be worthy. Absolutely. But American Society is such a broad term. I mean, there are so many things about my society that I dislike.... > > I think that what Castro has accomplished inspite of his Dictatorship > and other violations in Cuba is something to respect, and there are > things that can be emulated. I do not agree with his Dictatorial > regime, and the human rights violations that have been claimed under > his rule. I guess, if you want to isolate everything and say that it is remarkable that he has been able to maintain his power, and maintain Cuba as a viable economy, in spite of American pressures......OK. I guess i'll grant you that. But....um....so what? > > Again, my statement was about Chavez, you labelled him as a dictator > when he is not, according to Law. > You have put forward absolutely no evidence for your position on him, > now admitting you have no knowledge or position at all. *sigh* I think you have me mixed up with GG. I never called Chavez a dicator, I called Castro a dictator. I have put forward no evidence supporting my position on Chavez because i HAVE no position on Chavez. Keep things straight :) > > Why did you respond in the first place then? I responded when you started applauding Castro. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:190955 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
