I agree with you about NO, empowering and the fact that we give them something for nothing. I would much prefer that we make people do some sort of work for the welfare. In any case, my opinion remains that we can't let the poor go hungry, with or without an exchange for work, both as a moral issue and a security issue.
- Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Next in line to be labelled Dictator by America >> Matt wrote: >> You've hit the nail on the head. I'm don't believe that cities will >> dissolve immediately into crisis should welfare be removed, but I do >> definitely think that crime in the form of theft and murder will make a >> dramatic increase, to a point unheard of at the present time. >> > > Yes, but Welfare is only one solution, and a bad one. > > Back to your point, though, looting happened in New Orleans because > there was a breakdown in law enforcement. I saw plenty of video of > people shopping for TVs, shoes, etc. I doubt they were planning on > eating them. > > Back to my point, giving people something for nothing is a problem. > Empower them to create wealth rather than give them a handout. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:191910 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
