Not only that, they gave her money for saving her own. What's the difference between this and giving it away for food? Here's another question for you: is this woman off welfare? Would have she been able to save any money at all if she didn't have welfare?
- Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:10 PM Subject: Re: Score 1 For Capitalism, Empowerment >a thousand bucks didn't lift this woman out of poverty, Gruss :) This > program did however spend several million in grant money I am sure. > > On 1/12/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Dana wrote: >> > omg how much of this poor woman's time did they take up with these >> > classes :) And she got a thousand bucks out of it. Wow. >> > >> >> But it's great empirical evidence of the point I've been making. You >> don't fix poverty through give aways like minimum wage or welfare - >> all that does is tell people they don't have to compete or they don't >> have to work. >> >> Instead you show them the path to success and you reward them for >> taking it. It work fix it all but it'll definitely pass the 80-20 >> rule. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192106 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
