The taxes weren't subsidizing wal-mart, they were subsidizing people. You make it sound like wal-mart got the money.
I guess it is ok, when the 5 workers at the store down the street don't have any healthcare at all so the state kicks in. But when wal-mart employees are involved people get mad. So now we will have wal-mart spend a little bit of money. What will this do, it will probably end up getting these people worse care than they have now. Wal-mart will spend the money, and maybe some people will come off medicaide only to go on to an HMO that has greater restrictions. So are they people going to be any better off? No probably not. > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:38 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > they probably will. The interesting part about this thread is that though > the archives don't display the author, I can still tell who is talking ;) > > Anyway -- yes, I do think it is a sign of sanity. My taxes should not be > subsidizing Walmart. > > Dana ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192267 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
