I never said the law was good I said wal-mart is evil... On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Home Depot is not in the same line of business. Their employees make a > lot > more money than Wal-Mart employees. You ever tried to get a job there? > It's hard as hell. They expect a lot more of their employees, things like > construction, plumbing, electrical or interior design experience. > > Apples and oranges homie. > > Adam, admit it, this is a bad idea. I know your almost there man, I can > hear the desperation in your typing. > > Yes, it's a nice idea. Yes it would be great if there were a way to do > this > legally and financially, but there really isn't man. > > Also it's immoral. It's extortion. > > If I were Wal-Mart I would say "Fine, our jobs aren't good enough for your > state?" Then I would close every store in Maryland until they decided to > get rid of this law. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:47 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > > > I am not saying everyone should have healthcare. I don't mean > > to come off that outlandish. But provide something that is > > beificial (read not a CRAPPY > > HMO) but also affordable. If you're full time you desrve > > this. Plenty of other LARGE companies do this. Home Depot is > > the second largest retailer in the US, they have competative > > prices with thier competition (heck lower soemtimes). But you > > don;t hear stories like this about them... > > > > Adam > > > > On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > What I understand is that if Wal-Mart had to provide health > > care for > > > the thousand or so employees at my store, either the store wouldn't > > > have existed, or there would have been far fewer employees. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:30 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Wal-Mart > > > > > > > > exactly so you over looked the lack of health care benifits and > > > > possibly other things that a company SHOULD provide. You > > are willing > > > > to make sacrafices I understand that anything is better than > > > > nothing, but a company should nto take adavtage of this. > > > > > > > > Adam > > > > > > > > On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > No. It means they are an employer. > > > > > > > > > > I already mentioned I worked there for years man. Does it suck? > > > > > Yeah. I was a young married guy, no education, GED, > > > > nothing to offer a company. > > > > > They let me have food on my table, and I was happy as shit > > > > to have it. > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:14 PM > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer > > subsidizing Walmart > > > > > > > > > > > > I think where I see a problem is that sometimes > > people have NO > > > > > > CHOICE but to work there. A crappy job is still a job > > it atleast > > > > > > pays for some stuff. I mean if you need money yopu need > > > > money amd > > > > > > jsut b/c walmart furnashies a job for me does that > > mean thier a > > > > > > great employer??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/13/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You just made my argument for me. People CHOOSE to > > work there. > > > > > > > Knowing ahead of time that there is no medical > > care. So why > > > > > > > should the state or anyone else pay for their health care? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:56 AM > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer > > > > subsidizing Walmart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe not, but I won't be paying for it. As everyone > > > > > > keeps saying, > > > > > > > > people choose to work there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >only to go on to an HMO that has greater restrictions. > > > > > > So are they > > > > > > > > >people going to be any better off? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >No probably not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192330 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
