It's true that people work there voluntarily, and that in some places they fight over jobs at Wal-Mart, sad as that is. My question is why underwrite them? When you use tax dollars to private advantage you should be very sure that you are promoting the public good imho and this is demonstrably not the case here.
>On 1/17/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My whole point was arguing this whole people who take a job voluntarily. >Being at the bottum of the barrel is a shit load better than being outside >of the barrel. Walmart, and other companies, know this and I think they >abuse this by offering very low wages and beifits. Great agrument that hey >they can get away with it and thats thier bussiness. Should governement get >involved ell thats a matter of opinion. Me personally I'm on the fence here. >In this case we're talking about a company that is not being, in my opinion, >socially responsable and a company should be socially responsible. The >governement has setup a long list of laws a rules to force the indivual to >be socially responsible. So while the government can force the indivisual to >be socially responible they should not/ can not force a company to be >socially responsible? > >Now the whole thing above sounds like a classic conservative vs liberal >issue and NO a company should not be force to solve social problems. They >shuold however be forced to be socially responsible themselves. > >Adam ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192826 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
