Yeah, I am pretty much done with it. > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:14 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Wal-Mart > > If the University of PA study I posted late last night > doesn't do this to your satisfaction, then I don't know what > to say. I do think it would take regression analysis and > though I have limped through one or two a while back it would > take more time and resources than I personally have available > to do a complete model. I'll check the other thread to see > what if anything you have to say about it. > > I have to admit though, I am getting tired of the topic and I > suspect everyone else is too. > > Dana > > > >>3> The effect on the local economy of a Wal-Mart store is > often negative. > > > >That is the point I have yet to see anyone prove. > > > >Quite simply this should be quantifiable. Wal-Mart has been > following > >the same practices in a great different types of economies > successfully > >for decades now. Your point should be easy to prove, with available > >quantifiable data, released by cities and citizens that have been > >burned by "the system". These numbers do not exist anywhere > online that I can find. > >What I find reads more like "the government did it" paranoia that we > >heard after 9/11. > > > >Tim > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:55 PM > >> To: CF-Community > >> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193145 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
