Don't you remember ninedwarfs.com? It wasn't about issues so much as idiocy. Which candidate does the dumbest thing given a particular situation. So unless the new site is actually about issues, there would be no reason to really "test" the guys you want to look good since the point is that nobody will look good since they're all a pack of fools. :-)
On 1/19/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Obviously on issues I'll be tougher on the D's since I'm a conservative. > > Interesting, I should think it would be the other way 'round. As a > conservative I'd think you'd want to make sure you're taking your > potential candidate to task for consistency, message and above all, > sticking with actual conservative platforms (smaller government, > personal responsibility, etc.) > > Especially after the way the sitting president has all but abandoned > the classic conservative values. Well, I guess except for religion, > being anointed by god hizzownself... > > > I'm actually excited. I honestly think this idea has potential to be more > > popular than the last one! > > It could very well be. and given the fact that you've already had a > bit of celebrity with the other site, there's a good chance the > wags'll be back to talk to you. > > > -- > will > > > "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; > and that would just be unacceptable." > - Carrie Fisher > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193278 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
