well, they are objects, arent they? meat... yes. intelligent human beings, no. tits with a carrier yes.
jk, really, im not a chauvanist pig! tw On 1/19/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's hot. > > Kevin Graeme wrote: > > Yeah. Basically if the pictures aren't of appropriate attire for > > people in the office, then they aren't work safe. It's not a question > > of nudity so much as sexual objectification. > > > > On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>seriously? > >> > >>tw > >> > >>On 1/19/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>how about a nsfw tag please,,, > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193316 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
