They didn't strike it down its in limbo. They said they believe filtering will do the job so the law wasn't needed but a full trial in Philly would determine that. It's not about censorship, it's about proving you're old enough, same as looking at a Playboy at 7/11.
On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrote: > DOJ. Which is their job. > > But I think the really interesting part of this is that the Supreme > Court already struck this law down. So I guess El Presidente decided > that since he's got Alito coming on board he can get this another > go'round. > > Then when the unconstitutionality is questioned - again - his packed > court'll rubber stamp this idiocy. > > neat huh? > > I imagine there'll be a few more of these type cases coming in the > next couple years...the Oregon physician assisted suicide law recently > upheld will be an interesting case... > > I guess with Alito, he gets do-overs. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193353 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
