I like your thinking, however my rational logic was if I had a spare gun, use it, shoot them both and place the gun in the hands of the hostage takers.
Indicating that he shot the hostage then turned the gun on himself. You get away scott free. No lawsuits. -----Original Message----- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:22 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: test You are the closest, but the correct answer is, nuke them both. It's much more gratifying than just shooting. Also, you have to think about the possibility if you shoot the hostage, they might sue. So, nuke the hostage and no lawsuit. Of course, the family might sue, so you can either nuke them as well, or get rid of them using more traditional methods. I would recommend the nuke. That way, after you take out the whole neighborhood, you can rezone it and sell it off to commercial developers. You gotta think these things through :) Todd ----- Todd for President Nuking hostages and their families, for a better tomorrow. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adkins, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:59 AM Subject: RE: test > Easy .... Shoot them both. neither gets away hahahahaha > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:52 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: test > > > Pop quiz hot shot. What do you do when you can't get off a clear shot > at the hostage taker, but you don't want them getting away with the > hostage? What do you do? > > Todd ______________________________________________________________________ Macromedia ColdFusion 5 Training from the Source Step by Step ColdFusion http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0201758474/houseoffusion Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
