Exactly. I've not heard one good reason why these warrants should be circumvented. Not one. And yet there are still people who seem to support the Bush admin's desire to do just that.
Makes no sense. Zip. Zero. None. > And electronic surveillance under FISA requires a warrent from the FISA > courts. > > On 1/23/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Right, it was FISA that was passed in 1978 that gave the president that >> authority. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193859 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
