On 1/24/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uh, yeah, that's because CF's primary advantage is ease of use and rapid
> development.

ok, great... not a downfall.

> What everyone seems to be conveniently ignoring, though, is that a well
> written compiled program will outperform a well written CF program.

how can you say this? for real dog.  how?  with enough server ass and
well written code, it will perform no less better that any application.

> So your project was done on Monday, someone elses was done on Tuesday, and
> theirs runs faster. Which one becomes more valuable to the company? Depends.

the one that they spent less time and money on.  employee costs included.  a
cf developer costs far less than most GOOD .NET developers that we have come
across.

> Again, rapid development is a great advantage, but it's not the whole
> picture.

you are right.  again i still see no benefit.  but like most have
said, its about the
right tool for the right job.  for a web based application, cfmx 7.0
could and can stand
head and shoulders above ANYTHING else.

tw

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194082
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to