On 1/25/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Autocratic Sam wrote: You're really getting annoying as hell with this.
> Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about. First, brokers > can't influnce shit, and second, institutional investors who bought > around the IPO sold to compensate for the extra risk and take profits. > > Further, as RoMunn pointed out, other institutional investors who'd > missed the boat originally, bought in. There are some analysts that > still put the target at $600. > > In a nutshell: smart money out, dumb money in. True I'm just guessing but you haven't convinced me you know what you're talking about either. Aren't the brokers the ones that call their clients and say we need to dump some GOOG at 450 because it's going down and when it stops will buy it again in the 300's because it's only BS story and will work it's way back up? Yes, smart money out and dumb money in, but that's happens on a daily bases not once when there's a bogus story. How do you think Google got over 400 if the smart money wasn't selling all along? Now the China issue I figured would make Google go up just because of the increased revenue stream, yet it's taken a hit. Something to do with trust, go figure. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194298 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
