you haven't been in the conversation up to now, I don't think. FWIW I agree 
with you on both counts -- and would prefer a workable private alternative if I 
could imagine one -- but I don't think I do, or should, agree to the 
proposition that we should do away with welfare because someone's cousin is 
lazy.

Dana

PS - saw a mention of the Fair Tax on the about econommocs site the other day.

>And I think you missed my point, which was that there are a ton of
>people out there cheating the system, no matter what the system.  And
>that some of us HAVE actually met the welfare recipients that we are
>talking about (however briefly) and that while many of them have a
>legitimate need, but that alot of them are actually lazy and
>undeserving.
>
>But mostly I replied because she mentioned Atlanta.  And since when
>did we install "threat topic police"?
>
>-Cameron
>
>On 1/29/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tim

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195135
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to