Well, it would help curb HALF of the earmarks. (The president, regardless of party, will be much more likely to veto lines from the other party than line from his party)
On 2/1/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah. Personally I think the President should have line item veto power. It > would help curb the abuse of the budgeting process that goes on through > earmarking of projects in Congress. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195386 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
