so then why has the DC police issued an apology, and blamed hypersensitive fuzzy interpretations of the rules as the reason she and the other woman were apprehended?
conveniently bending the rules for a bushier tomorrow! tw On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, she doesn't have the right to attend! She gave that up the minute she > broke the rules. > > No politically motivated t-shirts allowed. That seems like a pretty simple > rule to follow for a 1 hour long address. Her intention was obvious: break > the rule, get kicked out, play the victim card, try to get everybody riled > up: "I can't believe you kicked this woman out of the speech! Her son got > killed in Iraq!" > > > true. but who cares now... she didnt get to attend. > > and thats what was wrong. i doubt she could have been well > > behaved... but she has that right to attend, right? > > > > i dont know, washington is sooo screwy, and wow, the rhetoric > > from both sides is RATCHETING UP quite loud! > > > > tw > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195495 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
