I've stated in the past that if the Palestinians were really interested in peace then I'd have no problem giving them land for a state. If they were interested in peace, stopped their terrorist brethren, instituted rule of law and stopped with all the anti-Semitic BS like blaming Israel for everything (uranium bullets, aphrodisiac gum, poison gas, aids, etc.). As they have not fulfilled even their first treaty with Israel which requires them to stop teaching hate of Jews and Israel and disarm terrorists (among other things), then no I don't think they deserve a state. But if they did fulfill their requirements and acted as a civilized unit, then yes, I'd be for giving them a state. I guess that makes me central on your scale. So if I'm central and I'm far right of you, then you must be far left of me. Your a left wing pinko commie! :)
>> Dino wrote: >> That's your definition of left and right? > > Barak, Labour, supported a Palestinian state. Netanyahu, Likud, does > not. Sharon falls in the middle. Most of the free world defines them > as left, right, and center respectively. > > As I didn't want to write a political tome I was using those > definitions and guessing, based on some of your posts, that you'd be > more Likud than Barak. Maybe I'm wrong. So I'm asking: as for a > Palestinian state are you more Barak, Netanyahu, or Sharon - if you > had to pick - and what would you label yourself? > > My sincere apologies for using convenient labels, but feel free to correct > me. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196319 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
