I do support the 2nd, but just not the way you interpret it. The 2nd
is more of a states right - than an individual right.

larry

On 2/22/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You aren't going to make an argument based around the constitution are you?
>
> Christ I wish you could support the parts you don't like (2nd, 10th) the way
> you support the parts you do.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:40 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
> >
> > So you have no problems with government bureaucracy ignoring
> > search warents and court orders etc. The government is always right.
> > Bureaucracy uber alles.
> >
> > What the hey, the constitution is just a piece of paper anyways.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > On 2/22/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As Spock said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of
> > the few, or the one."
> > >
> > > >So you have no problems with the Dept of Fish, Game and Wildlife
> > > >acting like jackbooted storm troopers kicking down private law
> > > >abiding citizen's doors. No due process involved, with arbitrary
> > > >rules with no right of appeal.
> > > >
> > > >right.
> > > >
> > > >larry
> > > >
> > > >On 2/21/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197814
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to