yeah, we all know the dinosaurs were already here when Xenu imprisoned the body thetans here on earth.
On 3/3/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dude, seriously, we know for a fact through dating technologies that history > goes back faaaaaaar longer than 6000 years. > > I mean come on this is nuts man. My mom actually believes that satan planted > fake dinosaur bones in order to keep us from the "lord". > > > -- > Tim Heald > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 703-300-3911 > -----Original Message----- > From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:55 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: colour vision evolved to detect blushes? > > Really, who the hell are you to tell them they're wrong? You weren't > there any more than they were. You've got something you believe in, they > have something they believe in. Why do you continue to bring this subject > up? You're really an intolerant person. > > - Matt > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:37 PM > Subject: Re: colour vision evolved to detect blushes? > > > > "Phasmae Evolutionary Theory" > > I like the sound of that one. > > > > The sad thing is that there are so many people who genuinely think > > that things are no older than 6500 years. That some guy with a long > > beard and white robe said let there be light. In other words biblical > > literalism. > > > > Unfortunately for them that was rejected by the Christian church as > > far back as St. Augustine. > > > > larry > > > > On 3/3/06, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:21 PM > >> > To: CF-Community > >> > Subject: Re: colour vision evolved to detect blushes? > >> > > >> > don't count on it. There's a reservoir of ignorance that almost > >> > limitless. > >> > >> Oh - don't get me wrong - judicial decisions won't curtail ignorance. > >> But I > >> do think that they will change things. > >> > >> When the creationism-in-schools movement is dealt a big legal blow it > >> tends > >> to turtle itself for a while and then appear in a new guise. Remember we > >> started with "Biblical Creationism" then moved to more generic > >> "Creationism" > >> then went to "Creationism Science" and ended up most recently with > >> "Intelligent Design". > >> > >> What's next? "Architected Naturalism "? "Frameworked Biology"? > >> > >> Personally I think that they're going to take the current issues to heart > >> and attempt to "embrace and destroy" evolution. Perhaps "Directed > >> Evolution" or (to please the young-Earth folks) "Phasmae Evolutionary > >> Theory". This would promote the idea that evolution does occur but is > >> actually an unneeded side-effect of architected biology. > >> > >> You see - there's lots of ways to dress up the same idea and have another > > >> go > >> at the courts! > >> > >> Jim Davis > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198805 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
