Stiring the pot? I thought we already put this issue to bed? There's only one person on this entire list actually arguing that ID is valid science right?
-Cameron On 3/12/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense > Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing > down real science, but their arguments don't hold up > By John Rennie > > Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically > advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still > persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a > flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas > such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution > in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board > of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some > antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the > University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, > admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a > "wedge" for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God. > > http://sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199684 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
