Yes and no, my argument also assumes there is one higher power, one rule set. I do assume mine are right. However I could accept being wrong in that assumption if I found out that somebody else's are right.
I guess what I'm getting at is that there is one set of morals, one right, one truth. And that I feel that truth states certain things. However because no higher power has come down and told me what they are, my assumption can be incorrect. My belief of what is moral and is not moral can be wrong. But I believe that in the end that same moral truth is universal. And we can argue over what they are, but in the end they just are. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:57 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Being Gay: Nature or Nurture? > > You are of the opinion that every subscribes to your beliefs. They don't. > > Many Gods (and their followers) do not have a prohibition against > killing. Some even think it a religious necessity. > > In your belief system, you have defined rights and wrongs. They will > not match the beliefs of others. I know that this then makes them > "wrong" in your beliefs, but again, that is just YOUR belief. > > Your argument assumes YOUR higher power and beliefs are the only > correct ones, and therefore anything that disarees with them is wrong. > > (I also feel this way, but YOUR beliefs are the ones that are wrong. > Mine are right. Although I probably question mine a lot more than you > do.) > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200051 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
