I've never considered personality archetyping to be a science. I consider it to be an interesting conceptual model that can lead to what seem to be insightful analysis of behavior.
> all I can think of when I hear this is Barnum's thing with > This way to > the egress. > do a scholar.google search on typology and personality. > You'll find > that that whole thing on personality type has been > subsumed years ago > in what's been nicknamed the big 5 personality theory. > larry s. isaac dealey 434.293.6201 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200200 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
