Here's the report from MacWorld; from the sounds of it, the install is
not for the faint hearted.:

http://www.antiwrap.com/?944

 Related Topics: The Intel Transition, Mac Desktops
Hackers get Windows XP working on Intel Mac

By Peter Cohen

A contest to see who could get Windows XP working first on an Intel
Mac has been won, according to the contest's coordinator, Colin
Nederkoorn. The Windows XP on an Intel Mac page provides a link to a
download that includes software and instructions for use.

Nederkoorn first put the contest together after he ordered an
Intel-based MacBook Pro for work.

"I told my boss that this would replace my IBM desktop and I could
boot Windows XP on it," he said, and to put his money where his mouth
was, he put up $100. He suggested that others with an interest in
seeing a dual-boot Macintosh do the same.

To date, the contest has raised over $13,854 in donations, including
significant additions from Digital Express, Delicious Monster and
Uneasy Silence. Nederkoorn says that any further donations will go to
support an open source project created to maintain the work that's
already been done.

News that Windows XP was working natively on an Intel-based iMac first
came to light several days ago, when two enterprising users who go by
the monikers "narf2006" and "blanka" posted pictures to an account on
the Flickr photoblogging service purportedly showing Windows being
installed on the system. A video followed, and the solution has since
been verified by Nederkoorn and his testers.

Getting Windows XP to work on the Mac is not a plug and play process.
According to the documentation included with the file download
provided on Nederkoorn's Web site, users must create an install CD
themselves using a PC equipped with a CD-R drive, Microsoft's Windows
XP SP 2 CD-ROM and Nero CD burning software. Step by step instructions
for creating the disc are included.

Users must also reformat and repartition their Intel Mac's hard disk
drive to include a separate partition where Windows XP can be
installed, then go through a multi-step process to make sure the
software is installed properly and the Mac can recognize it.

Once that's done, users will be able to switch between Mac OS X and
Windows after rebooting the Mac.

Nederkoorn notes that with this process in place, all three current
Intel-based Mac models can run Windows with the exception of the
20-inch iMac. He also offers a variety of caveats — native graphics
drivers aren't in place yet, for example, so there is limited video
performance — a blow to Mac gamers who had hoped for a solution that
would let them play Windows games on their new Mac hardware.

"There is no chance you could play a game using this solution, aside
from minesweeper," said Nederkoorn. "It looks like a fix for this may
be a ways off yet."

The Apple Remote and the iSight webcam don't seem to work yet, either.

Windows XP is already able to work on Intel Macs, but only through the
use of machine emulators, which work more slowly than many users would
like. The most popular emulator, Microsoft's Virtual PC, does not yet
support Intel-based Mac hardware, and Microsoft has not yet indicated
if or when an Intel version might be released.

Hope that Macs might support Windows out of the box dwindled last week
during the Intel Developers Forum, when a Microsoft rep told attendees
that Windows Vista will not support EFI, the boot technology used by
Macs, at least until a server version is ready in 2007. And even then,
Microsoft said the support will be restricted to machines that use
64-bit processors. Apple's current crop of Intel Macs use 32-bit
processors.

In order to claim the prize, the winners had to avoid using emulation.
They also had to avoid using virtualization software such as VMWare,
which allow multiple operating systems to work on a single computer
simultaneously.

Updated 12:22PM March 16, 2006: Information added regarding file download.

Updated 12:50 March 16, 2006: Provided details on installation process.

On 3/16/06, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Davis wrote:
> > I'm REALLY curious about they got around the lack of a traditional BIOS.
> >
> > If they had to emulate a BIOS would that really be any different that just
> > running an x86 emulator?
>
>  From what I understand, XP supports the BIOS replacement used in the
> new Mactels... once you're booted.  Which means that once booted, you
> could drop BIOS emulation.  In theory.  In theory.....
>
> --Ben
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200333
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to