What about the innocents that have been held there - such as the three brits
who were arrested on a trip to attend a relatives wedding? They are out now,
but I have little doubt that there are others held who are completely
innocent.

On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> I was with you until you mentioned Gitmo.  You would rather they were
> penned
> up where?
>
> Or would you rather they were just executed, the way that both the laws of
> land warfare and Geneva accords say we can.  Should we just kill them all
> Dana?
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Oh come on. They wanted to invade so badly they could barely sit still.
> They
> made it very clear that they were not listening to anyone else. That was
> what set off the flags in my mind, though I was still hoping that I was
> wrong really and they would turn out to be completely right.
>
> I said at the time that I was operating on the premise that this
> administration always lies and always has some sort of corrupt agenda, and
> that they had yet to truly disappoint me. With the possible exception of
> Afghanistan, they have still yet to do so, and we hear so little from
> Afghanistan that it may not be an exception either.
>
> Oh, by the way, here is today's horror story -- having previously defined
> oil byproducts to be "not pollution" there is now afoot a plan to make
> national forests that have been through a natural disaster available for
> clear-cut logging. Natural disaster has been defined to include snowfall
> and
> rainstorms.
>
> You have to admire what this administration can do with a definition. Like
> Guantanamo...
>
> ok, rant over.
>
> >its great to say now, but how the fuck did ANYONE REALLY know?
> >its easy as shit to say  "i told you so"
> >
> >you nor i, nor anyone else REALLY knew.
> >
> >tw
> >
> >
> >On 3/16/06, Michael Bramwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200401
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to