So, haven't we made the world a better place for the Iraqi people? Aren't they more free because of our actions?
-- Tim Heald [EMAIL PROTECTED] 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:00 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this world a worse place to be. I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this disgusting affair. As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows me would laugh out loud at that - particularly my jewish friends. I would lay down my life for something I believed in, but I grew out of playing with guns when I started wearing long trousers. On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did or > did not exist at this point. > > BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true? > > How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the > anti-Semitic bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me > sick. How about instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand > for something, with not only your principles, but your life on the line? > > > -- > Tim Heald > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 703-300-3911 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > > how about you actually deal with the point being discussed instead of > spouting another load of spin. > > On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about the violations of the cease fire? > > > > How about the UN resolutions allowing us to use force to enforce the > > sanctions that were being violated? > > > > How about the attacks against American Aircraft? > > > > How about the fact that oil is actually of vital importance to the > > national security of the United States? > > > > > > -- > > Tim Heald > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 703-300-3911 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:16 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > > > > That's what blows all the "this means we were right to go in" > > arguments apart. We had ways of finding out if he did have WMD and > > the UK and US governments didn't let the people involved finish their work. > > > > On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Just a reminder the people on the ground, the UN inspectors who > > > were in Iraq, and the IAEA always said that there were no WMD's. > > > > > > On 3/16/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When you have your own guys, plus other countries all agreeing > > > > that they have them, then the risk factor seems within the bounds. > > > > > > > > If you try it and you turn out wrong, then people second guess, > > > > which is good if it makes us better, but when the point is just > > > > to belittle then it doesn't help anybody. > > > > > > > > Were mistakes made? Clearly. However I don't think they could > > > > have done this any other way. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:13 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent > > > > > Attack > > > > > > > > > > > Dino wrote: > > > > > > Israel only attacked Iraq when they were building a nuclear > > > > > > reactor > > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > express purpose of gaining nukes to attack Israel. > > > > > > > > > > Combine that with what gMoney said and you have: > > > > > > > > > > 1.) If we thought there was a threat, why didn't we just bomb > > > > > the shit out of it w/o having to go in? Lame Answer: mobile labs. > > > > > Apparently REALLY mobile. So mobile they don't exist. Which > > > > > brings > > us to ... > > > > > > > > > > 2.) Why don't we know how reliable our intelligence is? From > > > > > the beginning the whole everybody-thought-blah-blah-blah > > > > > strikes me as absolutely moronic. It's called risk management > > > > > - I know they offer classes at HBS on the topic. Bush must've skipped them. > > > > > Whenever you have intelligence you have a reliability factor > > > > > on it. Either ours was low and we went in anyway or we > > > > > haven't learned shit about intelligence in the last 50 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200473 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
