I suppose that's better than your height of pussy. I'm guessing the Germans would've improved your families gene pool.
You get what you give there Waynie, tit for tat. Wayne Putterill wrote: > Just what the conversation needed . six foot seven of stupid :) > > On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Wayne, just be glad your fellow countrymen a generation ago didn't "grow >> out", otherwise, you'd probably be speaking German. >> >> >> >> >> Wayne Putterill wrote: >> >>> I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this world a worse >>> >> place to be. >> >>> I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this >>> disgusting affair. >>> >>> As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows me would laugh out >>> loud at that - particularly my jewish friends. >>> >>> I would lay down my life for something I believed in, but I grew out >>> of playing with guns when I started wearing long trousers. >>> >>> On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did or >>>> >> did >> >>>> not exist at this point. >>>> >>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true? >>>> >>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the anti-Semitic >>>> bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How about >>>> instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for something, >>>> >> with >> >>>> not only your principles, but your life on the line? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tim Heald >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> 703-300-3911 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM >>>> To: CF-Community >>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>> >>>> how about you actually deal with the point being discussed instead of >>>> spouting another load of spin. >>>> >>>> On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> How about the violations of the cease fire? >>>>> >>>>> How about the UN resolutions allowing us to use force to enforce the >>>>> sanctions that were being violated? >>>>> >>>>> How about the attacks against American Aircraft? >>>>> >>>>> How about the fact that oil is actually of vital importance to the >>>>> national security of the United States? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Heald >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> 703-300-3911 >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:16 AM >>>>> To: CF-Community >>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>>> >>>>> That's what blows all the "this means we were right to go in" >>>>> arguments apart. We had ways of finding out if he did have WMD and the >>>>> UK and US governments didn't let the people involved finish their >>>>> >> work. >> >>>>> On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Just a reminder the people on the ground, the UN inspectors who were >>>>>> in Iraq, and the IAEA always said that there were no WMD's. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/16/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> When you have your own guys, plus other countries all agreeing >>>>>>> that they have them, then the risk factor seems within the bounds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you try it and you turn out wrong, then people second guess, >>>>>>> which is good if it makes us better, but when the point is just to >>>>>>> belittle then it doesn't help anybody. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Were mistakes made? Clearly. However I don't think they could have >>>>>>> done this any other way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:13 PM >>>>>>>> To: CF-Community >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dino wrote: >>>>>>>>> Israel only attacked Iraq when they were building a nuclear >>>>>>>>> reactor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> express purpose of gaining nukes to attack Israel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Combine that with what gMoney said and you have: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1.) If we thought there was a threat, why didn't we just bomb >>>>>>>> the shit out of it w/o having to go in? Lame Answer: mobile labs. >>>>>>>> Apparently REALLY mobile. So mobile they don't exist. Which >>>>>>>> brings >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> us to ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> 2.) Why don't we know how reliable our intelligence is? From >>>>>>>> the beginning the whole everybody-thought-blah-blah-blah strikes >>>>>>>> me as absolutely moronic. It's called risk management - I know >>>>>>>> they offer classes at HBS on the topic. Bush must've skipped them. >>>>>>>> Whenever you have intelligence you have a reliability factor on >>>>>>>> it. Either ours was low and we went in anyway or we haven't >>>>>>>> learned shit about intelligence in the last 50 years. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200491 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
