Tennessee was too much like Duke, in that they were one dimensional. They should not have been a number 2 over LSU or Florida (not that either of those two should have been either).
On 3/24/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we all agree that Tenn was a little overrated as a #2 seed though? > Agree > the SEC was hurt by not having a marquee team, like a Kentucky, > consistently > in the top 10 all year (Although I guess Florida was up there most of the > year??? They just never got much respect from the national media) > > The SEC always plays defense though....and tends to lead to tourny > success, > as Duke will tell ya this morning. > > > One of the things I hate about the outside view of the SEC is that when > > Kentucky has an off season everybody assumes the SEC isn't anygood. > > > > But this year I think Kentucky had an off season, but at the same time > > several other SEC teams did pretty well. It was a crazy year in the SEC, > > usually a couple of teams like Kentucky and Florida come out as clear > > winners, but this year there were several teams. > > > > Tenn, LSU, Florida, Bama, and Kentucky all had a decent shot at the SEC > > title. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:201412 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
