He said he was selected by the vice-President and came back and briefed the VP. Both statements were false. She's a Dem supporter as is he and there are still plenty of people out to discredit Bush in the CIA. So by pretending his appointment was presidential bypasses the bias scrutiny. A beautiful plan isn't it? And just in time for a book release.
On 4/6/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > I agree with your conclusions, but not how you got there. I am totally > disenchanted with the Democrats, who allowed all this to happen. I didn't > think much of them to begin with, but they seemed the best of a bad choice. > > However. > > Conflict of interest? C'mon. You guys are listening to Rush Limbaugh or > something. Half of Washington is married to the other half. How is being > married to a CIA agent an impediment to discovering the truth of a matter on > a diplomatic mission? I am asking, really. Are you talking about the idea > that he was recommended by his wife? So what??? He was a former ambassador, > he knew some of the people. ::shrug:: Can you Bush apologists *really* look > at what happened in New Orleans, or at Donald Rumsfeld's track record, and > tell me you don't think the man was qualified? > > Cause if you are, I am going to have to sweep the floor so I don't get too > dirty when I roll around laughing my ass off at you. > > Dana ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203325 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
