Here is the Executive Order, and the relevant statements about
classification/de-classification authority:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/bush/eoamend.html

Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification. (a) Information shall be
declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification
under this order.

(b) It is presumed that information that continues to meet the
classification requirements under this order requires continued protection. In
some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be
outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in
these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions
arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency
official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion,
whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the
national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure. This
provision does not:
(1) amplify or modify the substantive criteria or procedures for
classification; or

(2) create any substantive or procedural rights subject to judicial review.

The order also clearly states that the President and VP have classification
authority:

Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify
information originally may be exercised only by:
(1) the President and, in the performance of executive duties, the Vice
President;

(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President in the Federal
Register; and

(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section.

The Administration's argument is that the national security interest in
protecting this information (again, we're not talking about Plame's
identity, that isn't part of the authorized disclosure) was outweighed by
the public interest in knowing about the Iraq-Niger yellowcake connection.
Keeping in mind the information being disclosed was the National
Intellegence Estimate about the yellowcake connection, not the identity of
Valerie Plame.



On 4/7/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What he said, from what I read din the post today, was that they had the
> right to share classified information as they saw fit.  That's not the
> same
> thing as declassifying information.
>
>
--
---------------
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203363
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to