No, like Nick or Rob mentioned already it was old pre-war info, didn't
matter that it was declassified. As mentioned they were working on
declassifing it anyway. What's the issue?

On 4/9/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
> <g> ok :) Read it again tomorrow though. From the top, the infor was 
> classified, arguably being declassified (though see my thought experiment in 
> the other thread) and probably also false.
>
> Ok so, the point is that this discredited classified information that they 
> "declassified" by leaking it? They knew it was wrong when they leaked it.
>
> Dana
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203472
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to