No, like Nick or Rob mentioned already it was old pre-war info, didn't matter that it was declassified. As mentioned they were working on declassifing it anyway. What's the issue?
On 4/9/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > <g> ok :) Read it again tomorrow though. From the top, the infor was > classified, arguably being declassified (though see my thought experiment in > the other thread) and probably also false. > > Ok so, the point is that this discredited classified information that they > "declassified" by leaking it? They knew it was wrong when they leaked it. > > Dana > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203472 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
