it was on the local news this morning, but it was also followed by
"administration downplays reports of planned airstrike, Bush claims to still
be working on a diplomatic solution."

*sigh*

On 4/9/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I got a good grin out of Nick's response, though.
>
> But I am afraid I agree with you. My first reaction was naw...they
> wouldn't. My second was yes, yes, they really are that stupid. This is an
> administration that can't even declassify a document properly and that's by
> its *own* account.
>
> The fact that it's Seymour Hersh reporting it also lends it quite a bit of
> weight. This is someone who would not say "messianic" unless he was sure.
>
> >> Nick wrote:
> >> Bah, there is so much stupid stuff going around nobody knows what the
> >> intent or what will come of Iran.
> >>
> >
> >Normally I would poo-poo this, but given this administration's
> >strategic and analytical track record, I'd have to give it a 80%
> >chance of being true.  That is, that the administration is seriously
> >considering hitting Iran with "tactical" nukes given they don't stop
> >their enrichment program
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203485
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to